Does the Intuition of Distinctness Result from Valid Reasoning? – Reply to Kammerer

Abstract According to an influential physicalist view, the intuition of distinctness is a cognitive illusion in sense that it results from fallacious reasoning: we erroneously infer referents phenomenal and physical concepts are different, fact there certain difference between our uses those concepts. (Kammerer, Review Philosophy Psychology 10:649–667, 2019) has recently argued, however, psychologically implausible fallacy: reasoning process leading this is, several psychological respects, similar valid dissimilar typical fallacies, which gives us reason think case reasoning. I argue no reasons underlying (or at least crucial part process) There fact, only one respect resembles reasoning, although two processes respect, does not rule out fallacy, namely, sort physicalists have mind. Furthermore, since fallacies result fallacy.